Judgement

Dispute over the Copyright of Nan Huai-Chin's Works

On January 31, 2001, Nan Huai-Chin and Guo Hengyan signed a Power of Attorney stating that "I have entrusted Guo Hengyan as my special authorized agent, who shall have the sole authority to represent me in handling all copyright matters of all my works in the Chinese mainland.

The People's Republic of China Beijing Intellectual Property Court Administrative Judgment (3)

In sum, the evidences submitted by the Plaintiff MACY’S are sufficient to prove that the Disputed Trademark was publicly, truthfully and lawfully used during the designated period

The People's Republic of China Beijing Intellectual Property Court Administrative Judgment (2)

In the process of litigation, MACY’S additionally submitted the following evidence materials: New Evidence 1: Data on products bearing the Disputed Trademarks manufactured by part of Chinese enterprises in 2009 - 2012, which are collected by MACY’S Taiwan Office; among which,

The People's Republic of China Beijing Intellectual Property Court Administrative Judgment (1)

The Plaintiff, MACY’S MERCHANDISING GROUP, INC. (hereinafter referred to as "MACY’S"), brought within the statutory period to the Court an administrative litigation against the Decision concerning Review on Revocation of the Trademark “CHARTER CLUB” No. 1192709 (Shang Ping Zi (20

CHINA'S TOP 20 CASES OF COPYRIGHT IN 2017 (4)

Case 16 The Case of Zhejiang University Press’ Infringement upon Copyright Trial Docket: (2017) Zhe861MinChu No. 2270