Recognizing that some AI-generated works may qualify for copyright protection, based on theoretical, legal, and economic considerations, can encourage users to engage in creative activities using AI tools and support the ongoing and healthy development of the AI industry.
Moreover, the same idea may be conceptualized differently in different professions. Take the copycat, for example, which under Copyright Law, is the copying of the expression of ideas
In October 2017, Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court made the first instance judgment on the case of Guangzhou NetEase Computer Systems Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Huaduo Network Technology Co., Ltd. on copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes.
With the vibrant social and cultural life in China, it becomes a commonplace to see people perform the copyrighted work of others in public. Many of such performances are not authorized by the copyright owners and come with legal risks.
