China’s Shanghai Intellectual Property Court has lately upheld a lower court ruling in favor of German carmaker Daimler AG (戴姆勒股份公司), renamed as the Mercedes-Benz Group in 2022, in a trademark lawsuit lodged by it against Shanghai Tonghe Auto Parts Co., Ltd. (上海同和汽配有限公司) and Shanghai Tonzie Auto Par
China’s Beijing Intellectual Property Court on April 6 upheld a lower court ruling in favor of Wilo China Ltd. (威乐（中国）中国水泵系统有限公司), German pump maker Wilo SE’s Chinese unit, in a trademark lawsuit lodged by it against Weile Pump (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. (威乐泵业（江苏）有限公司) and Beijing Yangguang Keyu Solar Ener
China’s Tianhe District People’s Court of Guangzhou city on May 7 ruled in favor of Thai drink maker T.C. Pharmaceutical Industries Co., Ltd. (天丝医药保健有限公司) in a lawsuit lodged by it against Guangdong Red Bull Vitamin Drink Co., Ltd. (RBVC) (广东红牛维他命饮料有限公司) and its two subsidiary companies in a lawsuit
The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) published a list of nine exemplary trademark proceedings, including five trademark opposition ones, one review one, and three invalidation ones. Article 2 of the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China provides that in principle
China’s Shanghai Intellectual Property Court in February upheld a lower court ruling in favor of Swedish seal maker Roxtec International AB (烙克赛克) in a trademark infringement lawsuit lodged by it against Chinese competitor Shanghai Yibo Shipping Co., Ltd. (上海怡博船务有限公司), ordering Yibo to pay 500,000 y
